In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo

By: Herschel | June 10th, 2009

From past commentaries most everyone who actually reads what I write knows that I am not a fan of Wizards coach Curt Onalfo. Adding fuel to the fire was the pathetic display that team showed last Saturday in a 2-0 loss vs. a 10 man Columbus Crew. After last Saturday’s performance, KC has 1 win in their last 7 games (2 of those non wins came against teams with 10 players for almost 1/3 of the game).

There are just a long list of decisions and statistics coming from Onalfo that lead me to believe that he is not the right coach for the Wizards. I’ve come up with a summarized, not all inclusive list, which details some of my gripes:

1. In his third year Onalfo still has not been able to come up with a “stable”, constant group of players. His lineup changes (at time drastic) are result driven and are very predictable. If he wins he will play the same team, again; same tactic again until he loses, regardless of if it’s at home or on the road. In other words Onalfo plays the result and forgets about the tactics that his team uses vs. a certain rival; or if the team actually looked good (i.e: the same team that “earned” a 1-0 win vs. a ten man Red Bulls team on a 2nd minute penalty where the team was horrible, got to start the next game against DC United in what was another bad game). On the flip side he will make 2 or more changes when he loses, regardless of how the team played and who or what lead the team to the loss. Granted, Onalfo isn’t Pep Guardiola, but I can’t remember Barcelona taking about a 1/3 of the team off after a loss. I’ve always believed in continuity and that is never achieved when players, especially young ones are afraid of losing their spot for making mistakes when taking risks. I would not be surprised that next Saturday rookie Matt Besler loses his job as left back for giving up a penalty. Similar situations occurred with Aaron Holhbein, Tyson Wahl and Kurt Morsink last year after “mistakes” lead to goals.

2. Too many “fan favorites” get a pass. In 2007 it was Eddie Johnson who could do no wrong. In 2008 and 2009 Davy Arnaud and Jack Jewsbury will not lose their starting spot for anything they do. All these players have been crowd favorites and front office money makers and are penciled in week in and week out. After a torrid start in 2007 Johnson cooled off significantly and showed what some thought to be a poor effort, too the point where some people thought he was a lazy player; regardless of that he played every game and Onalfo did not sit him on the bench. This year Davy Arnaud had a great start, but has been less than mediocre in the last 10 games; games where he started and completed where all he showed was effort but little quality. Jewsbury, like Arnaud had a good start but has steadily declined in productivity, to the point where he was responsible for the game tying goal for LA 2 weeks ago; he made a mistake that has cost other players their starting role. To his credit Onalfo did sit Claudio Lopez down last year for a few games, but I actually believe that it was done to rest him at the end of last year more than because he went through a spell of bad games.

3. The Wizards rely too much on their international players and will play them until they either are proven to be complete failures, or until the fans expect so little that even mediocre play from one of them now draws applause. Marinelli, Trujillo, Colombano, Lopez, Hirsig; of these 5 players in the Onalfo era only Lopez has proven that he belongs in the field over some of our other “local” talent. Hirsig has had his good games but he has not proven to be the superstar we were promised; he surprised the MLS in his first couple of games, but now MLS players and coaches have figured out that he rarely plays a one touch ball so they now collapse on him and close his passing lanes. Those great passes we saw in the first 2 games have been missing for a while and he has actually lost balls that have led to 2 opponent’s goals this year; add to that the fact that lately he will drop at the slightest touch from the opponent; this has him as one of the MLS leaders of fouls received, but at the same time refs are catching up and call a foul only about half the time (last Saturday he lost 5 balls where he hit the ground trying to draw the foul and the ref just let the game go on). Regardless of their individual play the Onalfo/Vermes camp seems to want to play these players as much as possible hoping that they either come out of their slump, produce something positive, or at least log enough minutes with them so that they can justify sending them home after an unsuccessful season where “they could not adapt to MLS style of football”, i.e. Marinelli, Colombano and Trujillo. I will mention that once these international players lose favor with Onalfo they will rarely see the field, regardless of how well they do with the Reserve team of how bad the guy in their position is (Trujillo).

4. Onalfo the decision maker makes me scratch my head a lot during games and makes me wonder what he was thinking. Let me illustrate this with a few examples. Last year in the playoffs at home vs. the Crew the Wizards were up 1-0 and had Gomez ejected; with 15 minutes left and clinging to this slim lead that would be important to keep for the 2nd leg of the playoffs, Onalfo never flinched and never though about pulling a forward to reinforce a weekened midfield; the result C-bus tied, took a 1-1 game home for the 2nd leg and eliminated the Wizards. That second game brought on another Onalfo decision that made scratch my head; in a playoff game, down 1-0 Onalfo goes with Michael Kraus as a substitute for Abe Thompson; Kraus who had not played 1 MLS minute was thrown into a playoff game (vs. big man Ivan Trujillo); less than 20 minutes later he pulled Roger Espinoza out for Matt Marquess, a left back that started 4 games during the season. Things that make you go HMMM. Add to these last Saturday’s decision, when losing by one goal he pulled an attacking midfielder for a forward when he was a man up and the Crew only had Barros up top. Oh boy! Like these decisions there are many others that go against what one could consider as logical and that sadly have not really panned out.

5. Let me throw this stat out there. Onalfo predicates fast “exciting football” but the Wizards have only 1 win with a 3 goal difference over their opponent. Opening day vs. Toronto in 2007. Curt, nail biting and exciting are not the same in soccer.

(To be continued, yes there are more things I have to say)



KC Wizards MLS ForumsKC Wizards ResultsBet on KC Wizards games Buy KC Wizards Tickets



Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo digg:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo reddit:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo fark:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo Y!:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo stumbleupon:In Curt’s World (Part 1). My rant against Curt Onalfo

Comments  

  • dan |  June 10th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    cornercorner

    Point 5, way to steal a stat that Mike at Down the Byline has posted multiple times (on his blog and on bigsoccer) like it’s original.

    Overall, though, I can’t argue with most of your points. Onalfo’s subs in the last game were mind boggling, why pull Gomez for Thompson when we’re a man up and a goal down? We needed more attacking options on the field, not a “like for like” type sub.

    Honestly I like most of Hirsig’s game though. While he does need to get rid of the ball quicker some times, he is one of the few players that will hold the ball up and actually control the tempo of the game. Part of the reason I think for his lack of playing quicker balls is the smaller CAB field (which I think hurts the Wizards a lot with the way they like to play). I think Hirsig’s best games have been away from home, when he’s on a bigger field and has more space to work.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Herschel |  June 11th, 2009 at 5:50 am

    cornercorner

    Thanks for the comment Dan. Actually I was going to use a generic stat on the Wizards not winning by 3 goals in the last 2 seasons because of the publicity we hear every week at the CAB about if KC scores 3 goals in a game gets those of us at the CAB get a free sub. Last Saturday when they said that I was actually tempted to yell “like that’s going to happen”. I corrected it when I saw Mike’s post on Big Soccer. Due to the last minute change (edit) I forgot to credit him but I will on my part 2.

    Back to the rest; Onalfo is very frustrating: the fact that I can guess 90% of the time what subs he will make for every game even when there are things like red cards and injuries just comes to show how predictable he is. If I can catch the “pattern” of subs or changes to the lineup I’d have to say that people that make a living studying these things (like MLS coaches) will catch them too.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Laurie |  June 11th, 2009 at 7:02 am

    cornercorner

    You guys get a free sub for three goals? That’s not fair! We only get a free haircut. (Like I’m going to trust my hair to a $9.99 haircut place.)

    Although given that either has the proverbial snowball’s chance now that Fredy Montero’s lost his shooting boots, I guess I can’t get too worked up about it.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • SombraAla |  June 12th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    cornercorner

    So… let me get this straight. You are unhappy that he hasn’t gotten a ’stable group of players’ but are _also_ upset that (what you call) ‘fan favorites’ get a free pass? Same thing with the international players too – you seem to want to have them replaced… yet apparently it’d be a bad idea to tinker with the lineup.

    “If he wins he will play the same team, again; same tactic again until he loses, regardless of if it’s at home or on the road. In other words Onalfo plays the result and forgets about the tactics that his team uses vs. a certain rival; or if the team actually looked good (i.e: the same team that “earned” a 1-0 win vs. a ten man Red Bulls team on a 2nd minute penalty where the team was horrible, got to start the next game against DC United in what was another bad game).”

    A) The next game after the NY game would’ve been @Toronto. I suppose you ignored this fact since the lineup did in fact change between NY->Tor->DC. Would also seem to hurt your claim that he doesn’t make changes according to games being home and away.
    B) You seem to be confusing tactics and personnel here… yes, the two games had the same lineup (something I would expect to be considered a good thing based off of your initial comments in this paragraph), but that does not necessarily imply that the same tactics are used. Just because you can’t see what’s different does not mean that it’s not there. Do you _really_ think that Onalfo just copies the last game plan, changes the team name from NY to DC (in this case) and sits at his desk and pretends to work?

    The fact that you don’t acknowledge Hirsig as ‘worthy’ either shows your tremendous bias against internationals or a poor ability to judge performance/talent/skill. You also miss the mark completely by including Colombano in a gripe about “[t]he Wizards rely too much on their international players and will play them until they either are proven to be complete failures, or until the fans expect so little that even mediocre play from one of them now draws applause.” If anything, he showed a spark and promise in the few minutes he got in 2008 – I would’ve liked to see him do a bit more, but it wasn’t going to work out for him in KC anyway, so there’s no point in discussing it. Marinelli was a head case… he obviously had the talent to perform, but didn’t feel like it or something. In any case, you can hardly say he was overused. As for Trujillo, I also don’t see where he comes into play in a gripe about relying too much and playing too often our international players. He got a chance, he didn’t perform and he left – doesn’t seem like a really big deal to me… Of anything, you could say that Marinelli was a mistake and we relied to much on him… or even that Lopez underperforms (though I would probably say that at any given time that you could be critical of Lopez you might also look to see if one of his (generally much younger) teammates were also at fault.)

    Also, a sidenote to the whole international players gripe… when did Onalfo claim that Hirsig was going to be a superstar? When did _anyone_ claim that?

    As for the decision making… yea, sometimes I question what he’s thinking too, though I don’t presume that, because I don’t understand why he does something, what he is doing is necessarily illogical, wrong or stupid. As far as the first playoff game last year, I can understand not making changes after the RC because Gomez is not exactly the most defensive minded player and Lopez can drop back into mid and take up whatever slack is there. You can be sure that Onalfo was cursing the fact that he took off Thompson slightly before the RC, but you can hardly expect or play for situations like that which ought not happen. While I won’t speak much about the Kraus substitution in the 2nd leg (although I will say that I think he put more thought into it than just a coin flip or whatnot), the Espinoza/Marquess sub isn’t _that_ hard to figure out; Harrington moves into the midfield and Marquess takes his place at LB.

    Sure, Onalfo has, and will, make mistakes. That’s going to happen, though… and still it is impossible to determine if things could have actually worked out better if he had done something else. You seem to make it out to be relatively simple… but I don’t think you give the job or Onalfo the credit they are do.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Herschel |  June 15th, 2009 at 7:42 am

    cornercorner

    You miss the point. If the team is playing well and is on a streak, even if they lose there shouldn’t be a reason to pull 2 or 3 players. If the team is not playing well and somehow they don’t lose you it would be nice to see some kind of change. Wins or losses should not always be the determining factor for changes.

    Yes the Toronto game was after the NY game, but the only “voluntary” change he made to the lineup between NY and TOR was Espinoza for Gomez, since Jewsbury was out with a concussion; and the next game (DC) he played the NY lineup again.

    I don’t think I am confusing tactics and personnel here. Do the Wizards really have different tactics at home or on the road? I’ve really failed to see that, at least offensively. They actually seem to play better on bigger fields and have had trouble at the CAB, which leads me to believe that they are using the same one, or the one at home is a bit faulty, regardless of this weekend’s win.

    I’d be careful about calling someone biased regarding anybody, especially foreign players. I DO believe that if there is an international player brought on to the team from another professional league they need to do better than our homegrown talent, since they do grow up in countries that usually have higher soccer quality. Lopez is unquestionably very talented. Marinelli was talented but often injured (the head case situation is debatable since I was at Swope the day of the fight and all I can say having understood the words behind the fight, that it takes 2 to tango and the Coach was equally confrontational; once there was a fight his fate was sealed). Trujillo and Colombano did not give immediate results and were buried on the bench and shipped out. Hirsig still doesn’t convince me since I think Jewsbury is a better holding mid defensively and sometimes the excessive holding of the ball has been a problem. Sorry to say but when an international player comes into a league the bar is set higher, it’s like that everywhere.

    Regarding the superstar thing, here is Vermes the day of the signing: “We have come across a talented and gifted player through our expanding international scouting and contacts,” Wizards Technical Director Peter Vermes said . OK, maybe not a superstar but I read something close to it.

    By the way since you called me out on my “bias”, I’d have to say that I’ve read a lot of your posts on BigSoccer and your style of writing/comments could be construed as very biased towards some of our younger Latin players who seem to be your “punching bags” like Espinoza, Morsink and at certain time Trujillo where you have gone into name calling and what or could be considered personal attacks. I’m sure that you would never do something with a biased overtone when only dealing with how players do their job on the field, but one should be careful on calling others biased when one could be seen guilty of the same.

    Regardless of what I write I try and keep the “on the field” and the personal (including names) very separate. But hey, to each his own, right?

    By the way, very cool hat at the game.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • SombraAla |  June 15th, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    cornercorner

    I get what you’re saying as far as the whole losses/changes thing – but I feel that it is less of an issue than we all make it out to be. First game was a loss, had two subs due to injury for the Colorado game and then made 3 changes from the first game – Watson and Besler as well as Hirsig, who hadn’t been match fit at the time. Played the same lineup for the next three games @Seattle, @Chicago and home to New York. Two changes for @Toronto – Harrington for the concussed Jewsbury as well as Espinoza for Gomez. Home vs. DC was the same team as New York. Harrington lets Lopez sit for a game against Columbus while Espinoza takes over for Gomez again.. the RSL game we have Lopez come back and then we make 3 changes for @LA, two of which are necessary due to red card suspension, and Gomez takes over for Espinoza again. Home to Columbus we get back the two red card suspensions (Wolff and Hirsig) and play the same team against NE.

    So, since the 2 loss start, Hartman, Conrad, Hohlbein, Watson, Besler, Jewsbury, Hirsig, Arnaud, Lopez and Wolff have played every game they were available and fit for. Espinoza and Gomez have been battling for the last spot.

    How have we not reached stability?

    Last year was a little bit more random, for sure, but we also had major changes mid-season last year as well. We got Wolff, Thompson, Gomez and lost Victorine and Sealy (and Colombano and, to an extent, Marinelli). Still, Hartman, Conrad, Harrington, Jewsbury, played every game they could… Wahl and Hohlbein traded spaces a few times, mostly due to injury… Wolff, Thompson and Gomez all started almost every game after they had made it into the starting lineup, with Wolff getting some rest near the end. Lopez also started almost every time except for a period where he was rested for a bit. He played around a lot during the period that we were doing poorly (the road trip and whatnot) but pretty much kept the same lineup from the LA game on, with understandable exceptions.

    As far as tactics go, I’m somewhat confused as your initial comments used two home games as an example but here you site home vs. away tactics. In any case, the last two games are a great example of how Onalfo has used different tacts despite having the same formation and starting lineup. We saw Besler and Watson get into the attack more often – overlap more, cut in to the middle at times… Of course, it’s somewhat difficult to really judge what the changes are because both games had relatively goals – and since one was for us and one was against us, the games were really changed in how they had to be played.

    As far as differing tactics home vs. away – are you saying you want to see a difference or not? It sounds like you do here, but again – your original point being about stability… I would think you wouldn’t want to see radical changes in approach. I, myself, prefer to see the same approach, home & away… as it does allow the players to get comfortable with the style that we’re going to use. As far as the team doing poorly at home this year, I think that has just as much to do with the opposition learning how to use CAB’s unique ‘features’ to their advantage. When it comes down to it, it’s more of a relative advantage for the away team to come in and frustrate the home side in a smaller field as opposed to a larger one. I also think it’s a relative advantage for a team who have gone a man down to play on a smaller field rather than a larger one as well. Last season we did better at home, but we also had the element of ’surprise’ – the opposition didn’t realize how much of an impact the field could be.

    “I DO believe that if there is an international player brought on to the team from another professional league they need to do better than our homegrown talent, since they do grow up in countries that usually have higher soccer quality.”

    So you are admitting to your bias then? Don’t get me wrong – you seem to take the comment as a grave insult of sorts… yes, sure… I didn’t intend it to be a compliment, but it wasn’t intended to be taken as questioning your honor or somesuch. The first definition (well, 2nd, after a diagonal line relating to fabric) I found was “A preference or an inclination, especially one that inhibits impartial judgment”, followed by “An unfair act or policy stemming from prejudice.” – I meant the former.

    In any case – sure, all things being equal, an international player needs to be better than a domestic player to be worth choosing above the domestic player. Domestic players get the tie breaker… that’s fine with me. But do you _really_ feel that Hirsig should have his spot taken over by a domestic player right now? Even if Jewsbury is better suited at d-mid, he’s already on the field anyway in a position I happen to like for him more – Jewsbury has a rocket of a shot which tends to be on goal more often than not… I still think you can look at the LA game and see how much Hirsig does for our midfield. I would also like to say that Hirsig has shown he can play faster, but only when the players in front of him are making moves to get themselves into spaces where they can receive the ball. It boggles my mind how often half the team is just standing around…

    “By the way since you called me out on my “bias”, I’d have to say that I’ve read a lot of your posts on BigSoccer and your style of writing/comments could be construed as very biased towards some of our younger Latin players who seem to be your “punching bags” like Espinoza, Morsink and at certain time Trujillo where you have gone into name calling and what or could be considered personal attacks. I’m sure that you would never do something with a biased overtone when only dealing with how players do their job on the field, but one should be careful on calling others biased when one could be seen guilty of the same.

    Regardless of what I write I try and keep the “on the field” and the personal (including names) very separate. But hey, to each his own, right?”

    Um, wha? I’m completely shocked by this statement. I happen to like Espinoza and Morsink quite a bit and have defended them in many situations. I thought that Trujillo needed to put away some opportunities that cost us some points early in the season, but I don’t remember ragging on him at all. I even went back two years worth of post history on BigSoccer to see what you were referring to and could not seem to find this behavior (I did get on Pore’s case in one game where he was doing particularly bad, but that was one game and he _was_ doing very poorly…) If anything, I might be considered ‘too optimistic’ or ‘too positive’, which I suppose is a type of bias, but is not what I think you were trying to say here.

    If you do happen to remember/have access to the situations you are referring to, do PM me on BigSoccer with them – it’s never too late for me to learn from my mistakes.

    “By the way, very cool hat at the game.”

    Thanks, I’m bringing back the fedora personally…. so in 10 years when we’re all wearing one again, you have me to thank.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


USA National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners









Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email kcwizards[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives